The “New Left” Isn’t The Only Opponent of Capitalism

The “New Left” Isn’t The Only Opponent of Capitalism

From the lefty VOX, commenting on “Alt-Right” (national socialist) support for “universal basic income” and “single-payer healthcare”:
Alt-rightists and other Trump-loyal conservatives — Richard Spencer, VDARE writer and ex–National Review staffer John Derbyshire, Newsmax CEO and Trump friend Christopher Ruddy, and onetime Donald Trump Jr. speechwriter and Scholars & Writers for Trump head F.H. Buckley — all endorsed various models of single-payer in recent months and years.
(Note: I’m not familiar with the “Trump-loyal conservatives” to know if it is fair for VOX to lump them with the “alt-right” as they do in the above paragraph.)White-nationalist Richard Spencer now supports Biden after Trump had Qassem Soleimani killed in a military airstrike.

***

Superficially, the 21st-century “new-left” and “alt-right” are on opposing ends, but in terms of essentials — like the fascists and communists of the 20th century — they are the same: both anti-capitalism.Recommended Reading:

The Democrat That Cried Racist, etc.

There has been much outrage and headlines over the "fact" that Trump wants to serve three terms.In truth, when Trump said he was running in 2048, or whatever year after a second term, he was in fact joking. From the Washington Post (April 2019):
President Trump on Thursday joked about serving more than two terms as president, telling a crowd that he might remain in the Oval Office “at least for 10 or 14 years.”Trump made the comments on the same day that special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s report was released to the public.At an event for the Wounded Warrior Project, Lt. Gen. Michael S. Linnington, chief executive of the veterans charity, gave Trump a trophy to thank him for his support.“Well, this is really beautiful,” Trump told the crowd in the East Room of the White House. “This will find a permanent place, at least for six years, in the Oval Office. Is that okay?”After some laughter from the crowd, Trump continued: “I was going to joke, General, and say at least for 10 or 14 years, but we would cause bedlam if I said that, so we’ll say six.”
Also see: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/trump-explains-why-he-talks-about-a-third-term

***

As for an example of a legitimate claim against Trump, the claim that Trump is using the antitrust laws against Amazon/Bezos because he regards Bezos and his Washington Post as a political enemy seems to have some merit (though we will have to see what facts the court case brings out). Then again, the Washington Post seems to approve of antitrust in general so perhaps there is some “justice” in their being “hoisted with their own petard.”

***

My point is that there is so much said about Trump — much of it untrue — that the noise drowns out legitimate criticisms of Trump. I see this with the fictional “boy that cries wolf,” or, the Democrat that calls every Republican a “racist!” “Trump’s a racist? Well didn’t you say the same thing about Goldwater, Ford, Reagan, Bush I & II, McCain, Romney, …”

The Q-Anon Distraction

There has been much made in the media of Trump's so-called support of some group called Q-Anon.Here is the first video that shows up for me on YouTube for “Trump and Q-Anon”:Here is the essence of what Trump said:
“I don’t know much about the movement, other than I understand they like me very much, which I appreciate ….I have heard that it is gaining in popularity … I’ve heard these are people that love our country.”
Here is what the video shows:
  • Trump doesn’t know anything about Q-Anon
  • Trump doesn’t walk into the reporter trap of condemning Q-Anon out of hand based on the reporter’s description
  • Trump opposes pedophilia
Q-Anon seems to serve the same role as the John Birch Society — a way for the Regressive-Left to condemn their opposition en masse.There are many things to condemn Trump on — personal character, tariff policies, immigration policies — the importance of the Q-Anon is not one of them.

Trump Era H-1B Visa Restrictions Bleed America of Its Foreign Talent

Stuart Anderson at Forbes succinctly points out that the Trump Administration's H1-B visa restrictions won't create new U.S. jobs, but move sectors of the economy outside of the U.S. where workers are not restricted by their nationality:
Government officials and others who ignore or won’t concede that the labor market is global seem to believe, despite the evidence, that companies won’t send work outside the United States in response to H-1B visa restrictions. “Foreign affiliate employment increased as a direct response to increasingly stringent restrictions on H-1B visas,” according to firm-level data in important research by Britta Glennon, an assistant professor at the Wharton School of Business. “[A]ny policies that are motivated by concerns about the loss of native jobs should consider that policies aimed at reducing immigration have the unintended consequence of encouraging firms to offshore jobs abroad.”“IT outsourcing has evolved from relatively simple tasks to much more complex software development,” notes the Wall Street Journal. “[Pennsylvania-based] EPAM developers, scattered across more than 160 offices in multiple time zones using Microsoft’s collaboration software, Teams, routinely work on a single project. For example, developers in Hungary, Belarus, Ukraine, and the U.S. are working on booking platforms for a major online travel company.”What will be the impact of the new H-1B regulation? “All of the changes in the regulation are likely to be resisted by employers as inconsistent with the statute and economically harmful,” said William Stock. “If allowed to go into effect, the regulation will continue the current trend of employers sending high-value technology work offshore because of policies from this administration that are keeping and pushing key personnel outside the United States.” ["Regulation To Restrict H-1B Visas Moves Toward Final Step"]

More importantly, as Robert Tracinski argued in Restrictions on “H-1B” Visas Punish Ability and Trample the Rights of Employer and Employee:

The irrational premise behind our nation’s immigration laws is that a native-born American has a “right” to a particular job, not because he has earned it, but because he was born here. To this “right,” the law sacrifices the employer’s right to hire the best employees — and the immigrant’s right to take a job that he deserves. To put it succinctly, initiative and productiveness are sacrificed to sloth and inertia.The “American dream” is essentially the freedom of each individual to rise as far as his abilities take him. The opponents of immigration, however, want to repudiate that vision by turning America into a privileged preserve for those who want the law to set aside jobs for them — jobs they cannot freely earn through their own efforts.The quotas on H-1B visas — along with all other visas — should not just be expanded; they should be eliminated. Any immigrant who wants to come to America in search of a better life should be let in — and any employer who wants to hire him should be free to do so. Anything less would be un-American.
Related: Rebecca Girn: Trump’s Immigration Visa Restrictions are a Violation of Individual Rights

Andrew Bernstein and Aaron Briley on Racism

"You know no one ever questions why a black student studies African-American studies but they do when he studies Aristotle, unfortunately."- Aaron Briley 
"The subject of racism has gradually snowballed over recent years, and exploded into mainstream culture over the past month. Brands are declaring their commitment to fight racism, several organisations have launched mandatory diversity trainings—even the Oscars have recently introduced certain diversity requirements for eligibility for the award. Individuals are making and denying accusations of racism in droves, and the terms ‘white fragility’, ‘systemic racism’ and ‘complicity’ have been used liberally and passionately. In order to make sense of, judge and properly respond to this new wave of events, it is essential to philosophically unpack it. What is racism? What is not racism? Is racism best countered by governmental action, organisational policy, or something else entirely? Andrew Bernstein is a philosopher and novelist. He is the author of several books, including The Capitalist Manifesto, Capitalism Unbound, and the recently-published Heroes, Legends, Champions: Why Heroism Matters. Aaron Briley, Ph.D., is a philosopher who promotes life-enhancing cultural values to black Americans, with the ultimate goal of bringing about a Black Renaissance of education, achievement, and fulfillment. He is a fellow/research associate Objective Standard Institute on race relations, cultural improvement, individualism, clear thinking, and freedom." Video made available by the Ayn Rand Center UK.

Voice of Capitalism

Capitalism news delivered every Monday to your email inbox.

Subscribed. Check your email box for confirmation.

Pin It on Pinterest