George Reisman: Western civilization is open to everyone

George Reisman: Western civilization is open to everyone

George Reisman on Western Civilization vs Barbarism:

From a historical perspective, Western civilization embraces two main periods: the era of Greco-Roman civilization and the era of modern Western civilization, which latter encompasses the rediscovery of Greco-Roman civilization in the late Middle Ages, and the periods of the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, and the Industrial Revolution. Modern Western civilization continues down to the present moment, of course, as the dominant force in the culture of the countries of Western Europe and the United States and the other countries settled by the descendants of West Europeans. It is an increasingly powerful force in the rapidly progressing countries of the Far East, such as Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea, whose economies rest on “Western” foundations in every essential respect.

From the perspective of intellectual and cultural content, Western civilization represents an understanding and acceptance of the following: the laws of logic; the concept of causality and, consequently, of a universe ruled by natural laws intelligible to man; on these foundations, the whole known corpus of the laws of mathematics and science; the individual’s self-responsibility based on his free will to choose between good and evil; the value of man above all other species on the basis of his unique possession of the power of reason; the value and competence of the individual human being and his corollary possession of individual rights, among them the right to life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness; the need for limited government and for the individual’s freedom from the state; on this entire preceding foundation, the validity of capitalism, with its unprecedented and continuing economic development in terms of division of labor, technological progress, capital accumulation, and rising living standards; in addition, the importance of visual arts and literature depicting man as capable of facing the world with confidence in his power to succeed, and music featuring harmony and melody.

The Universalizability of Western Civilization

Once one recalls what Western civilization is, the most important thing to realize about it is that it is open to everyone. Indeed, important elements of “Western” civilization did not even originate in the West. The civilization of the Greeks and Romans incorporated significant aspects of science that were handed down from Egypt and Babylon. Modern “Western” civilization includes contributions from people living in the Middle East and in China during the Dark Ages, when Western Europe had reverted to virtual barbarism. Indeed, during the Dark Ages, “Western” civilization resided much more in the Middle East than in Western Europe. (It is conceivable that if present trends continue, in another century it might reside more in the Far East than in the West.)

The truth is that just as one does not have to be from France to like French- fried potatoes or from New York to like a New York steak, one does not have to have been born in Western Europe or be of West European descent to admire Western civilization, or, indeed, even to help build it. Western civilization is not a product of geography. It is a body of knowledge and values. Any individual, any society, is potentially capable of adopting it and thereby becoming “Westernized.” The rapidly progressing economies of the Far East are all “Western” insofar as they rest on a foundation of logic, mathematics, science, technology, and capitalism–exactly the same logic, mathematics, science, technology, and capitalism that are essential features of “Western” civilization.

Read the full article.

Ayn Rand Institute Announces the Ayn Rand Center, a Permanent Home for the Legacy and Future of Ayn Rand’s Ideas

Ayn Rand Institute Announces the Ayn Rand Center, a Permanent Home for the Legacy and Future of Ayn Rand’s Ideas

AUSTIN, Texas, June 5, 2026 — The Ayn Rand Institute today announced the creation of the Ayn Rand Center, a landmark cultural and educational institution dedicated to preserving Ayn Rand’s intellectual legacy, expanding the reach of her ideas, and inspiring new generations of thinkers, creators, entrepreneurs, and students.

For decades, readers around the world have discovered Rand through novels such as The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. Her ideas have influenced millions of people, inspired countless careers and businesses, and helped shape discussions of philosophy, politics, economics, education, and culture. Yet despite her enduring impact, there has never been a permanent institution dedicated to bringing together the full scope of her life, work, and legacy.

The Ayn Rand Center seeks to change that.

arc

Located in Austin, Texas, near the University of Texas, the Center will serve as the permanent home of the Ayn Rand Institute and a global destination for anyone interested in exploring Rand’s life, novels, philosophy, and continuing cultural influence. The Center will house the Ayn Rand Archives, classrooms, event spaces, studios, public gathering areas, a state-of-the-art immersive educational experience, and the home campus of ARI’s education program, ARU.

“Ayn Rand’s ideas have reached millions of people around the world and continue to attract new readers every year,” said Tal Tsfany, CEO of the Ayn Rand Institute. “The Ayn Rand Center is both a recognition of that extraordinary legacy and an investment in the future. It will be a place where people can encounter Rand’s ideas for the first time, deepen their understanding of them, and engage with a worldwide community inspired by Rand’s philosophy of reason, rational self-interest, and individualism.”

Rand (1905–1982) was one of the twentieth century’s most influential novelists and thinkers. Through works such as The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged, she celebrated the power of human reason to understand the world, form moral values, and drive human progress. Neither a liberal nor a conservative nor a libertarian, Rand challenged dominant long-entrenched philosophic assumptions and developed a distinctive philosophy of reason, individualism, and laissez-faire capitalism that continues to inspire readers, scholars, entrepreneurs, and innovators around the world.

The Center will house one of the world’s most significant collections of Ayn Rand materials, preserving manuscripts, correspondence, photographs, recordings, and other historical resources for future generations. At its heart will be a world-class educational and immersive experience designed to bring Rand’s life, ideas, and fiction to life.

The Center will also serve as the home campus of ARU, offering educational programs devoted to the study of Rand’s philosophy of Objectivism, the history of philosophy, and the intellectual skills required for independent thinking and effective communication. Through courses, lectures, conferences, workshops, and public events, the Center will welcome students, scholars, professionals, and lifelong learners from around the globe.

More than a museum, archive, or educational facility, the Ayn Rand Center is intended to become a center of gravity for the worldwide community inspired by Rand’s work. It will provide a place for learning, debate, scholarship, collaboration, and cultural engagement while welcoming anyone with a genuine interest in exploring Rand’s ideas and extraordinary life story.

arc 4

The building itself, designed by John Ronan Architects of Chicago, has been conceived as a monument to human creativity and achievement. From its architecture to its exhibitions and public spaces, every element is being designed with a single ambition: to create a world-class institution worthy of one of the modern world’s most influential champions of reason, freedom, and human potential.

The Ayn Rand Center is scheduled to open in 2028.

Teaching Critical Thinking Gets Teacher Warren Smith Fired

With over 4 million views this video of teacher Warren Smith went viral: Utterly inspirational.Then this happened: As the saying goes, let no good deed go unpunished.
Tucker: Fauci’s Chutzpah Matches That of Sam Bankman-Fried

Tucker: Fauci’s Chutzpah Matches That of Sam Bankman-Fried

Writes Jeffrey A. Tucker in "What Fauci’s Deposition Tells Us About the Man" (The Epoch Times) after reading through 446 pages of Fauci’s deposition:
[Fauci] uses the phrase “I don’t recall” 194 times. In various other formulations, the invocation of his amnesia is closer to 300 over a 7-hour deposition. He continually falls back on just how busy he is managing $6.2 billion in spending plus 6,000 employees. This is why he simply cannot pay attention to the crucial issue being adjudicated: whether he directed agencies under his influence to censor science and other COVID-related matters at social media companies.To hear him tell it, he knows next to nothing about social media, never really pays attention to Reddit, has barely a passing familiarity with Twitter and Facebook, does not recall any real connection with Google, and condescends repeatedly to the attorneys with dismissive remarks about his own importance compared with their own petty concerns.[...] Even when confronted with emails he wrote, and references to phone calls he made, his defense is that he reads and sends thousands of emails and cannot be held to any of them. Even on matters related to the Great Barrington Declaration, he pleads that he had no time for such matters.“I’m not 100 percent sure that the meeting of the epidemiologists, authors of the declaration with the Secretary, this was very likely the first time it was brought to my attention, although I can’t say for sure. I would imagine—again, getting back to context, this is not something that I would have been paying a lot of attention to. I was knee deep in trying to do things like develop a vaccine that wound up saving the lives of millions of people. That’s what I was doing at the time. So an email like this may not have necessarily risen to the top of my awareness and interest.”This is fascinating because in other interviews and testimony, he equally claims that vaccine development is not his area and focus. He is for them but never approved them. That’s for others to do. Same with particular grants such as the many to EcoHealth Alliance that flipped the money over to the Wuhan virus lab that was deploying what any layperson would call gain-of-function research.[...]There’s a reason why gaslighting is Merriam-Webster’s word of the year. What Fauci is doing here embodies it better than anything else, comparable only to Sam Bankman-Fried’s own interviews.[...]Similarly, Fauci masquerades as an infectious disease doctor but actually ranks among the most feared of all health bureaucrats in the country. He was lord of billions in grants to scientists. He specialized in rewarding loyalists and punishing enemies. Thus was he surrounded by fake friends for many years, including among media sycophants who for sure knew the history so thoroughly documented in Robert Kennedy, Jr.’s book “The Real Anthony Fauci.” But they went along simply due to his awesome power.We also know from Fauci’s own schedule what his real job for three years has been: he was a media star, morning until night, daily, and only for friendly outlets. He shilled for lockdowns, school closures, mandatory masking and mandatory vaccines, and trashed anyone and everyone who questioned whether this was really the right way to go about handling infectious disease. Of course when he is confronted about all this, he demures and says he was merely making recommendations.Very subtly and carefully, however, what’s really happening with Fauci’s bout of amnesia is this: he is preparing a scenario in which he throws everyone else under the bus. All his associates are now aware of this. He is saving his skin and glad to sacrifice everyone else. I was among many thousands who read this transcript with awareness of precisely what he is up to. One can almost hear the screams of fury among the thousands who have dealt with him over the years."
Niall Ferguson on Zelensky and Fatalism in History

Niall Ferguson on Zelensky and Fatalism in History

Niall Ferguson on fatalism in history:
Contingency here means a relatively small event or decision. And it doesn’t need to be a decision. It can be something accidental, has very major consequences. And historical causations like that, something relatively small, can have tremendous ramifications. I’ll give you another illustration. This year, most people, including the US government, thought that if Russia invaded Ukraine, the Ukrainian government would quite quickly fold, and it was assumed that Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the Ukrainian president, would bail. He didn’t. He gave his famous response, “I don’t want an air ticket. I want ammunition.” And Zelenskyy’s courage when they were closing in on Kyiv with a high probability that they would assassinate, the Russians turned the course of history in a way that I think is now quite widely understood.People know Zelenskyy is an important historical figure. He gets a lot of attention because he is a charismatic figure who understands how to use modern media to communicate with an audience. That’s the benefit of having a very seasoned entertainer as your president. But I think what’s really important there is that his courage, particularly the famous video selfie video where he says, “I’m here. The defense minister is here. We’re here.” They’re standing in the streets of Kyiv. The Russians are closing in at that point on the capital. That was a tremendous act of courage. But it emboldened ordinary Ukrainians not to fold, and it also intimidated the collaborators who were ready to help the Russians, not to act. So the contingency there is if Zelenskyy had gone according to our expectation and taken the plane, then Putin would’ve had Kyiv within a matter of days or weeks, and the war would be over.So I think one of the things that’s exciting about the study of history is you are trying to remind yourself again and again that what happened, that what we know happened, might have gone the other way. That the Cuban Missile Crisis ended in both sides essentially backing down was not predetermined. There was a moment when a Soviet submarine commander gave the order to fire a nuclear torpedo at US naval surface ships. So we came within a hair’s breadth of World War III. These alternate worlds, these histories that didn’t happen, have to be alive in your mind when you are writing history.The fatal mistake is to write history as if it was bound to happen the way it happened. And this, of course, is the mistake that a great majority of historians make. Forgetting that, we don’t know at the time, at the moment, we didn’t know the morning of the 24th of February that Zelenskyy would stand his ground. Nobody knew that. I wonder if even Zelenskyy at that moment knew what it was that he was going to do.So I say all this because I think it’s really important to convey to your listeners and viewers how exciting history is and how studying it makes you understand the course of events in your own life better removes that passivity that sometimes people succumb to. If you think great historical forces are going to have inevitable outcomes, if you have a deterministic view of the historical process, it’s very easy to lapse into fatalism. There’s the other trap, which is the conspiracy theories. “Well, the truth of the matter is that actually, Soros and the Rothschilds are orchestrating all this.” Again, you throw up your hands and you abandon the attempt to understand how the historical process works.
Listen to the rest on the Tim Ferris Podcast.

Reparations for Slavery…From Africans

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Nd6kJxbvaIHilary Fordwich corrects CNN’s Don Lemon on British Empire over slavery during the Queen’s funeral:
Don Lemon: "Some people want to be paid back and members of the public are wondering, ‘Why are we suffering when you are, you have all this vast wealth?’ Those are legitimate concerns..."Hilary Fordwich: "Well I think you’re right about reparations in terms of – if people want it though, what they need to do is, you always need to go back to the beginning of the supply chain. Where was the beginning of the supply chain? That was in Africa. Across the entire world, when slavery was taking place, which was the first nation in the world that abolished slavery? ...the British""In Great Britain they abolished slavery. 2,000 naval men died on the high seas trying to stop slavery. Why? Because the African kings were rounding up their own people. They had them [in] cages, waiting in the beaches.""I think you’re totally right. If reparations need to be paid, we need to go right back to the beginning of that supply chain and say, ‘Who was rounding up their own people and having them handcuffed in cages. Absolutely, that’s where they should start."

Voice of Capitalism

Capitalism news delivered every Monday to your email inbox.

Subscribed. Check your email box for confirmation.

Pin It on Pinterest