Iran Students Cancel Protest

The following is from Cox and Forkum:

Today was supposed to be a momentous day for the revolt against throcracy in Iran, but sadly, according to a Reuters article, it appears that the mullahs' arrests, murders and threats have struck terror into those hoping to speak out: Iran students cancel protest to mark 1999 unrest. We'll see what actually happens throughout the day.

***

Yahoo News is reporting that Islamic Vigilantes Seize Three Iran Student Leaders. Excerpts: "Armed Iranian Islamic vigilantes seized three student leaders on Wednesday as they left a news conference where they announced they had canceled protests to mark the anniversary of 1999 university unrest, witnesses said. ... Authorities have banned off-campus rallies, closed campus dormitories, postponed summer exams and vowed to deal strictly with any unrest after arresting 4,000 people during 10 nights of sometimes violent protests across the country in June. [...] Witnesses said police and military units were posted outside the Tehran U.N. headquarters on Wednesday and photographers and camera crews were prevented from taking pictures at the scene." (Via Little Green Footballs)

A sworn enemy dedicated to our destruction is censoring, kidnapping and murdering dissidents right before our eyes, and all the media and the administration are talking about is Liberia. This is outrageous.

***

Yahoo News reports: Islamic Vigilantes, Police, Youths Fight in Iran. Excerpt: "Hundreds of Iranian hard-line Islamic vigilantes, police and pro-democracy youths fought three-sided running street battles near Tehran University on Wednesday on the anniversary of 1999 student unrest. ... A witness said police had fired tear gas at groups of youths near the campus and also fought fistfights with plainclothes Islamic militiamen to prevent them from engaging in more running battles with youths."

CNN and Fox News have nothing on this crucial story. One would think that after 9/11 the media would consider it a priority to report news of an anti-Islamist revolt in Iran, a country that even the State Department lists as the world's biggest sponsor of terrorism. But apparently not. It is a horrible error.

***

BBC reports: Raid anniversary sparks tensions. Excerpts: "[T]he students agreed to call off all protests after an intervention by reformist members of the Iranian parliament, who told them their demands would stand a better chance of being met -- and their leaders of being freed -- in an atmosphere of calm. ... Despite their compliance, three more student leaders were detained immediately after giving a news conference [...] One of them is believed to have had his nose broken as he was being detained. 'If I am arrested today, I don't guarantee that I won't come out with confessions against myself after they've held me for a while, because of the pressures they put people under,' Ameri-Nassab told journalists only minutes before he was seized."

Apparently detained student leaders were used as hostages to pressure the remaining student leaders not to protest. Once the protest was suppressed, the remaining leaders were taken hostage.

The BBC story notes more of the government censorship measures: "The authorities have also taken steps to silence the radio and TV stations run from California by Iranian exiles bitterly hostile to the Islamic regime. Residents who defy the ban on satellite dishes and watch the broadcasts said they had been jammed for several days. ... Several of the stations had openly incited Iranians to rise up against their rulers."

No need for mullah censorship in the American media. As of 2:30pm CST, CNN had buried the Update 2 story in their World section. Still nothing on Fox that I could find.

***

Iran-Va-Jahan reports that Clashes Are Spreading in Iran. CNN online has finally moved their story to the bottom portion of their front page (under World tab). Still nothing on Fox online.

***

More editorials on the Iranian demonstrations against the mullahs:

Reading the Popular Mood in Iran by Patrick Clawson of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. This contains good background information on the protests. (Via Iran-Va-Jahan)

It's Mullah time! by Mark Steyn. Excerpt: "[W]hatever the defects of post-ayatollah Iran, the fall of the prototype Islamic Republic will be a huge setback to the world's jihadi. ... It was Ayatollah Khomeini who successfully grafted a mid-20th-century European-style fascist movement on to Islam and made the religion an explicitly political vehicle for anti-Westernism. It was the ayatollah who first bestowed on the US the title of 'Great Satan.' And it was the ayatollah who insisted that this new Islamic revolution had to be taken directly to the West -- to the embassy hostages, to Salman Rushdie, and, ultimately, to America itself."

Lawyers Claim Fat People are Dense?

From Edwin A. Locke of the of the Ayn Rand Institute on:

The lawyers who claim that we are not responsible for the consequences of anything we do (e.g., smoking) are at it again. In a meeting in Boston two weeks ago, they decided to attack the food and restaurant industry. For what crime? For selling food that contains calories.

These lawyers are initiating lawsuits claiming that overweight people were not aware of the alleged dangers of eating fatty foods. If people are not aware that eating fatty foods in large quantities contributes to making them fat and may cause them health problems--something that has been publicized in the media virtually everyday for decades--then what are they aware of? These "victim" lawyers are not just claiming that people are not responsible for what they eat--they are claiming that people are not responsible for being conscious! If people are not responsible for being aware of reality, then just what are they responsible for?

Death to Theocracy in Iran

From Cox and Forkum:



Required Reading:

Iraq: The Wrong War by Leonard Peikoff
Iran--not Iraq--is the primary threat to American interest in the Middle East and has been since it confiscated our oil fields in the 1950s. Iran is the major sponsor of international terrorism throughout the world and is the country most responsible for lethal attacks on American citizens. For these reasons, Iran fully deserves bloody retribution.

End States That Sponsor Terrorism  by Leonard Peikoff
Fifty years of increasing American appeasement in the Mideast have led to fifty years of increasing contempt in the Muslim world for the U.S. The climax was September 11, 2001.

Death to Theocracy: America Must Act Now to Bring Down Iran's Regime by Robert W. Tracinski
The reasons for toppling Iran's theocracy are far stronger--and more certain--than the reasons for invading Iraq.

Iran, Not So Far Away by Scott Holleran
While the world seems locked in an endless debate over whether to strike even one state sponsor of terrorism --- Iraq -- the religious dictatorship chiefly responsible for the wave of Islamic fundamentalism that culminated in the Sept. 11 attack on America is becoming an imminent nuclear threat.

The Real Revolutionaries by Robert W. Tracinski
For months, courageous protesters have braved riot police to oppose the depredations of a warlike and oppressive regime bent on world domination. No, I am not talking about the "anti-war" protesters who menace the cities of Europe and America--the creeps who scale the barricade of a Starbucks storefront for no greater goal than the glee of smashing its windows. These are only brave and idealistic souls in their own warped self-image. I am talking about real courage and real idealism--the kind shown by the young men and women manning the very real and very deadly barricades of freedom in Iran--the students who, armed with nothing but a burning conviction of the rightness of their cause, are facing down a brutal theocratic dictatorship.

"Death to America" by Daniel Pipes
In retrospect, the mistake began when Iranians assaulted the U.S. embassy in Tehran and met with no Amrican resistance.

The Road to Victory Goes Through Tehran by Robert W. Tracinski
An end to the threat of Islamic terrorism requires, not just the toppling of one state sponsor of terrorism in Iraq, but the toppling of the regime that is the Middle East's most active promoter of terrorism--and the most virulent center of the ideology behind Islamic terrorism: the theocracy that rules Iran.

Iran is the Root of Islamic Terrorism by Joseph Kellard
Iran is the root of Islamic terrorism, and destroying its theocracy would be a major victory in the war on terrorists. But in this war the Bush administration takes an inverted, appeasing approach. Bush not only fails to declare that the US will us force to topple Iran's regime; he's busy appeasing Palestinian terrorists that are mere heads of the Iranian hydra.

The City of the Snoozing Teachers

Writes William Tucker at the NY Sun, on "The City of the Snoozing Teachers":

As Sol Stern illustrates on every page of his brilliant new book, Breaking Free, the teachers unions that run the public schools operate on the principle that people who finish in last place should set the standard for everyone else. Teachers unions don't simply protect against failure, they virtually embrace it. Everything in the teachers' contract is designed so that the worst teachers suffer the least amount of harm...

Finally settling down to raise his children on the Upper West Side in the 1980s, he was dedicated to the egalitarianism of the public schools....

At one point Mr. Stern encountered what he thought was a homeless derelict wandering the schoolyard. The man turned out to be a tenured teacher permanently shunted to playground duty. When the disheveled educator occassionally appeared in the classroom, the children complained of his body odor and made up songs about him.Yet union rules made it impossible to get rid of him. [July 8, 2003]

MSNBC Fires Savage

From Brent Baker at MRC:

Media Research Center President Brent Bozell today praised MSNBC for firing host Michael Savage for wishing death to a caller into his show over the weekend. But he also pointed out the hypocrisy: The same media turn a blind eye to liberals in the media who spew the very same hateful venom at conservatives. "MSNBC was right to fire Michael Savage. His comments have no place in civilized debate. But neither did comments that have come from liberal icons of television such as Bryant Gumbel, Nina Totenberg and Julianne Malveaux -- all of whom have said hateful things about conservatives, and none of whom has had to answer for it," Bozell said.

The release than goes on to provide some quotes, like this one from the nationally syndicated on PBS show Inside Washington, July 8, 1995:

Host Tina Gulland: "I don't think I have any Jesse Helms defenders here. Nina?"

ABC News/NPR Reporter Nina Totenberg: "Not me, I think he ought to be worried about what's going on in the Good Lord's mind, because if there is retributive justice, he'll get AIDS from a transfusion or one of his grandchildren will get it."

Or this one From To the Contrary on PBS, November 4, 1994:

USA Today Columnist/Pacifica Radio Talk Show Host Julianne Malveaux, on Justice Clarence Thomas: "You know, I hope his wife feeds him lots of eggs and butter and he dies early like many black men do, of heart disease. Well, that's how I feel. He is an absolutely reprehensible person."

Let’s Roll Over Iran’s Mullahs

Comments David Holcberg of the Ayn Rand Institute on the upcoming general strike in Iran:

As the July 9 general strike in Iran approaches, the United States should do everything within its power to ensure that the popular revolt against Iran's theocracy succeeds in overthrowing the regime.

Iran presents a much greater danger to the United States' security than did Iraq or Afghanistan.

Iran--as acknowledged even by the terrorist appeasers at the State Department--is the most active sponsor of terrorism in the world, supporting terrorist organizations like Hamas, Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad. Moreover, Iran--alongside Saudi Arabia--is the main source of Islamic fundamentalism in the world today, and thus the principal ideological enemy of the United States and the free world.

Iran is openly developing a nuclear weapons program, and has gone as far as threatening to use its soon-to-be-produced nuclear weapons against Israel, America's only true friend in the region. If Iran's mad mullahs are willing to strike Israel, the "Small Satan," they would not hesitate to strike their arch-enemy, America, the "Great Satan."

President Bush was right when he said eighteen months ago, in his State of the Union Address, that "time is not on our side." The President told the country and the world that he would not "wait on events, while dangers gather." But dangers have gathered and time is running out. In a speech at West Point a year ago President Bush promised: "The United States will, if necessary, act preemptively."

Let's roll. Before it's too late.

Congratulations to Roger Federer: Wimbledon Champion

After beating the reigning champion Pete Sampras in five sets two years ago, 19 year old Roger Federer, was hailed as the next Wimbledon champion. He then proceeded to loose his next match to Tim Henman in the 2001 Wimbledon quarterfinals. In Wimbledon 2002, he lost in the first round.

Today that prediction of a Wimbledon crown for Federer--made by myself at the start of this year's tournament, and also made by a "retired" Pete Sampras--became a reality, as Roger Federer defeated Mark Phillipousis in straight sets in the Gentleman's final to the tune of 7-6 (7/5) 6-2 7-6 (7/3).

Federer outplayed Phillipousis from the backcourt with vicious topspin backhand service return winners off high kicking serves, from the net with deft touch shots and volleys that pinpointed the corners, and from defensive positions with offensive angled crosscourt forehand passes made on the dead run. The Swiss superstar even outserved Phillipousis by scoring more service aces!

Writes Boris Becker for the BBC:

I am convinced [Federer] will be around for a long time and I am convinced he will win many more Wimbledons, US Opens and other Grand Slam titles. In a way, he has an old-fashioned technique. He does not just play heavy topspin, he is very versatile. He can serve and volley, he can stay back, he can slice, he can play drop shots. That is a good example for any junior watching. You don't need to serve at 135 mph, you don't need heavy topspin to become a complete player.

We have seen the future - it arrived today.

Federer is the greatest talent in one of the greatest individual sports--he is a combination of Pete Sampras, Stefan Edberg, and John McEnroe. He can do anything humanly possible with a tennis racquet. If any man playing today has a chance win the Grand Slam in one year--that is all four Grand Slam events in one year--it will be Roger Federer.

Libertarians for Dictatorship, Part II

A reader writes:
In your [Dollars and Sense news item] "Libertarians for Dictatorship," you libel libertarian Rep. Ron Paul as being pro-dictatorship because he [opposed] a symbolic resolution in support of freedom in Hong Kong.This is misleading, for Ron Paul opposes all symbolic resolutions because he believes it is not just to spend taxpayer money on unconstitutional resolutions. He calls this his "continuing and uncompromising opposition to appropriations not authorized within the enumerated powers of the Constitution."
Can it be any clearer that libertarians' preoccupation with nonessentials and disdain for philosophy makes them enemies of freedom?If Congress has the Constitutional power to declare war, and the power "to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution [its] powers," then it has a legitimate foreign policy role. Saying that the House has no business passing such a resolution is tantamount to saying that whether or not foreign governments are dictatorships is irrelevant to America's national security. Whatever "freedom" means to Rep. Paul, it has nothing to do with reality.

Dick Morris on Bill Clinton

From an open letter to Hillary Clinton by Dick Morris:

...The real reason I was reluctant was that Bill Clinton had tried to beat me up in May of 1990 as he, you, Gloria Cabe, and I were together in the Arkansas governor's mansion. At the time, Bill was worried that he was falling behind his democratic primary opponent and verbally assaulted me for not giving his campaign the time he felt it deserved. Offended by his harsh tone, I turned and stalked out of the room.

Bill ran after me, tackled me, threw me to the floor of the kitchen in the mansion and cocked his fist back to punch me. You grabbed his arm and, yelling at him to stop and get control of himself, pulled him off me. Then you walked me around the grounds of the mansion in the minutes after, with your arm around me, saying, "He only does that to people he loves." [June 12, 2003, "Setting the Record Straight: An open letter to Hillary Clinton", National Review]

Egalitarianism Is Hatred of the Good for Being the Good

From Andrew Wolf in Wednesday's New York Sun:

In September 1997, fourth-grade parents at P.S. 41 in Greenwich Village discovered that there would be four classes instead of the usual five, because of a slightly shrunken enrollment....  It wasn't just bigger classes for their children, but the fact that class 4-406 was being disbanded and their teacher, Lauren Zangara, moved to another school that upset the parents. A letter went home to fourth-grade parents asking them to donate $360 toward the $46,000 needed to keep Ms. Zangara and the extra fourthgrade class at P.S. 41. Amazingly, P.S. 41 was successful in raising the funds virtually overnight, to the delight of then-District 2 Superintendent Anthony Alvarado.  But once the commitment of the parents to their own children became public knowledge, they found themselves at odds with then-Chancellor Rudy Crew. Such a generous action would result, he believed, in an "imbalance" in the system, giving more affluent parents and their children an "advantage" over children from poorer neighborhoods. Mr. Crew allowed the teacher to be retained, but the school district had to come up with the cash. So serious an infraction was this, that there was even talk of bringing Mr. Alvarado up on charges for accepting the parents' generosity.

Harry Potter: The Rational Triumphs Over Evil

From Dianne Durante of the Ayn Rand Institute:

The most frequent criticism of the Harry Potter series is that it will lure children to witchcraft. This fear is unwarranted.

Fiction books aren't textbooks. The purpose of literature isn't to teach concretes but to show a broad view of The Way Things Work. Does good or evil prevail in the world? Do people think and act in accord with their own will, or are they helpless puppets? The enormous appeal of the Harry Potter series comes from the fact that Rowling presents characters who do think and act, and who repeatedly triumph over evil.

Kids who love Harry Potter are in no more danger of becoming witches than kids who love Finding Nemo are in danger of becoming fish.

American–and Iranian–Independence

Writes Dr. Edwin Locke of the Ayn Rand Institute:

On July 4 we celebrate American Independence Day--the anniversary of the day we freed ourselves from British tyranny.

On July 9, on the other side of the world, Iranian students and their followers will demonstrate in support of their own independence movement.

Their goal is freedom not from a foreign power but from their own theocratic dictators who have stifled every attempt at freedom of thought and expression. What strikes terror into the heart of the Iranian government is the idea that people will think for themselves instead of blindly obeying the dictates of the mullahs.

Let us hope that the Iranian freedom movement will ultimately triumph despite the terrible risks and odds which the students are facing, and that Iran will be the first Muslim country to recognize individual rights--the principle on which America was founded. To quote Ayn Rand, "The spirit of man will remain alive on this earth. It may sleep, but it will awaken. It may wear chains, but it will break through." And for the Iranians, the sooner the better.

China’s Gradual Enslavement of Hong Kong

Writes David Holcberg of the Ayn Rand Institute:

The United States should give its full moral support to the hundreds of thousands of Hong Kong residents who took to the streets this week to protest a set of "anti-subversion" laws about to be imposed on them by China.

The new laws, which would make illegal "treason, secession, sedition [and] subversion" against Beijing's government, are designed to extend to Hong Kong the same censorship and control China imposes on individuals on the mainland. Given China's record of considering any criticism against its government to be treason or subversion, the new laws will, in effect, abolish freedom of speech on the island.

When China took over Hong Kong in 1997, it made the empty promise to give its people 50 more years of freedom. Now it threatens them with endless oppression. Sadly, but not surprisingly, the American administration is silent, apparently unconcerned with this ominous event.

It is imperative that America protests China's move and support the pro-freedom citizens of Hong Kong to whatever extent possible. The United States should, at a minimum, offer to take in any immigrants from Hong Kong who wish to flee China's rule.

While it is probably too late to save Hong Kong from China's oppression, it is never too late to speak out in defense of freedom. Not doing so means abandoning not only the people of Hong Kong, but America's founding values.

If China succeeds in clamping down on freedom in Hong Kong, the majestic skyscrapers will remain, but the energy and vitality that created them will vanish.

De-Baathification

From Cox and Forkum:

Comments Allen Forkum:

In a June 27 Dept. of Defense press service article, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld was questioned about a "guerrilla war" in Iraq and answered by saying, "I don't know that I would use the word." We're not sure why there is a reluctance use the "guerrilla" label on the remnants of Saddam sympathizers (or "dead-enders" as Rumsfeld aptly dubbed them), but it was the most accurate label we could fit on a scorpion. Also in the article, Rumsfeld referred to efforts to recruit a "de-Baathicized" Iraqi army, which was good to hear; Iraq should be de-Baathicized the way Germany was de-Nazified.

Supreme Court Fails to Defend Free Speech

From Robert Garmong of the  of the Ayn Rand Institute:

In refusing to rule on the Nike case last week, the Supreme Court struck a heavy blow against freedom of speech.

The case involved Nike's attempts, in letters to editors and to university administrators, to counter charges that their overseas workers are abused. A critic, claiming that Nike's claims were false advertising, filed suit.

But Nike's letters deserve first-amendment protection. They were *not* advertisements--they addressed only the question of working conditions in its factories, saying nothing about its products. If such letters can be ruled a form of advertising, then anything said by any corporation about any aspect of its operations may expose it to crippling false-advertising lawsuits. Meanwhile the critics of corporations, whose speech is protected, can invent outright lies with no penalty.

By refusing to rule on this blatant violation of free speech, the Court officially declared open season on business.

Justices Thomas and Scalia are Wrong on The Ninth Amendment

The following letter to the editor was printed in the New York Sun (Tuesday). The portions in curly braces were cut by the Sun:

Contrary to Justices Thomas and Scalia--and to your editorial ["Sex and the Scotus," 6/27/2003]--the Constitution does require the Supreme Court to strike down Texas' antisodomy law. The Ninth Amendment clearly states that the mere fact that a right is not enumerated in the Constitution shall not be construed to deny or disparage it. {In other words, the Constitution envisions that the Federal Government shall have no powers but those granted in that document--everything not specifically authorized to the government is forbidden.} The "privileges and immunities" that citizens thereby enjoy are equally protected from infringement by state governments according to the Fourteenth Amendment, as envisioned by those who framed and ratified it.  The Constitution was enacted, not to permit democratic majorities to enact their whims, but to restrict the power of government regardless of anyone's will. Justice{Stanley}Matthews put this well:

"{Arbitrary power, enforcing its edicts to the injury of the persons and property of its subjects, is not law, whether manifested as the decree of a personal monarch or of an impersonal multitude. And}the limitations imposed by our constitutional law {upon the action of the governments, both state and national,} are essential to the preservation of public and private rights, notwithstanding the representative character of our political institutions. The enforcement of these limitations by judicial process is the device of self-governing communities to protect the rights of individuals and minorities, as well against the power of numbers, as against the violence of public agents transcending the limits of lawful authority, even when acting in the name and wielding the force of the government."

Navratilova: Useful Idiot

From MRC [June 26, 2003]:

Martina Navratilova, the tennis star who made millions in the U.S. after she left Czechoslovakia, has denounced the values of her adopted country. In an article in a German magazine reported by Reuters and picked up Wednesday night by FNC's Brit Hume, she complained: "Decisions in America are based solely on the question of 'how much money will come out of it' and not on the questions of how much health, morals or the environment suffer as a result." She also equated the U.S. under President Bush with Czechoslovakia under Soviet domination: "The most absurd part of my escape from the unjust system is that I have exchanged one system that suppresses free opinion for another." The unbylined Reuters dispatch from Berlin noted that she "singled out President Bush's Republican party for unusually harsh criticism. 'The Republicans in the United States manipulate public opinion and sweep any controversial issues under the table,' said Navratilova."

I take it Martina expects Bush to jailed her for her comments? Or perhaps torture her like Saddam tortured thousands in Iraq? How she forgets that it was the Left that supported that Soviet domination by "supressing the free opinion" of anti-communists by with smears of "McCarthyism." Fact is Martina is free to express her opinions; and we are free to express our opinion that to equate the Bush presidency with that of the former Communist Czechoslovakia is dishonest. If that is "suppression" in her dictionary than so be it. Stick to tennis Martina.

Voice of Capitalism

Capitalism news delivered every Monday to your email inbox.

Subscribed. Check your email box for confirmation.

Pin It on Pinterest