Black Lives Matter Cofounder Calls to Defund The Police

From Variety:
In tandem with Blackout Tuesday, the collective Movement 4 Black Lives, a coalition of more than 100 black-rights organizations, is launching a “five days of action” in an effort to fight systemic racism.Part of the effort is an “open demand” letter signed by Lizzo, John Legend, Taraji P. Henson, Natalie Portman, Jane Fonda, ACLU executive director Anthony Romero, and more that aims calls for a stop to increases on police budgets and to increase spending on health care, education, and programs for black communities. ["Black Lives Matter Cofounder Patrisse Cullors on Blackout Tuesday and How the Music Community Can Help", 2 June 2020]
Here is the full open letter:

Black People Are Dying of Police Terror and Covid19. It is time to defund the police NOW

Black communities across the nation are mourning the deaths of George Floyd, tortured to death by Minneapolis police, Ahmaud Arbery, a jogger who was killed while running in a residential neighborhood in Brunswick, Georgia, Breonna Taylor an EMT killed while asleep in her bed in Louisville,KY, Dreasjon Reed in Indianapolis and Tony McDade in Tallahassee. Their names are added to a devastatingly long list of Black people who have been killed at the hands of vigilantes or law enforcement. Not to mention the others whose names we don’t yet know, and may never know since they were killed without a camera recording it.At the same time, the United States leads the world in COVID-19 cases. So far, more than 100,000 people -- enough to fill a football stadium-- have perished from the virus, with over one million cases confirmed, and those numbers don’t reflect all the people dying from virus-related illnesses. Black people are suffering disproportionately from COVID-19, four times more likely to die than their white neighbors.It is important to state this within the context of the scourge of anti-Black police terror and the resulting uprisings taking place across the U.S. The COVID-19 deaths and the deaths caused by police terror are connected and consequential to each other. The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget in the world, and some of the most well-funded and militarized police departments in the world, too. Policing and militarization overwhelmingly dominate the bulk of national and local budgets. In fact, police and military funding has increased every single year since 1973, and at the same time, funding for public health decreased every year, crystallized most recently when the Trump administration eliminated the US Pandemic Response Team in 2018, citing “costs”.The time has come to defund the police.Black communities are living in persistent fear of being killed by state authorities like police, immigration agents or even white vigilantes who are emboldened by state actors. According to the Urban Institute, in 1977, state and local governments spent $60 billion on police and corrections. In 2017, they spent $194 billion. A 220 percent increase. Despite continued profiling, harassment, terror and killing of Black communities, local and federal decision-makers continue to invest in the police, which leaves Black people vulnerable and our communities no safer.Where could that money go? It could go towards building healthy communities, to the health of our elders and children, to neighborhood infrastructure, to education, to childcare, to support a vibrant Black future. The possibilities are endless.We join in solidarity with the freedom fighters in Minneapolis, Louisville, and across the United States. And we call for the end to police terror.We call for defunding of police and for those dollars to be rerouted to create a public national healthcare system.Join us in demanding your local officials take the pledge to:Vote no on all increases to police budgets Vote yes to decrease police spending and budgets Vote yes to increase spending on Health care, Education, and Community programs that keep us safe.
George Flloyd was not killed because the federal government has not nationalized health care, like it has most of education, infrastructure, etc.He was killed because a thug wearing a police uniform was empowered by law to kill an innocent man.
No mention in her letter is made that approximately 90% of black people in America are not killed by white police (the amount is around 1%), but 90% of blacks are killed by other blacks, and that police are those Blacks only form of protection. Apparently, those black lives don't matter.
No mention is made to reform the police -- and that being a police officer is a noble endeavor, and that most police officers are good people trying to do their jobNo mention is made of ending qualified immunity -- where a government official is not personally held responsible for their actions.No mention is made to work with the police to reform them.No condemnation of the blacks -- and whites -- and their communities, harmed by riots and looting -- and how disarming the good policeman leaves them at the mercy of murderers, rapists, and thugs.The real terror is the destruction that the "no justice, no peace" mob has created.

Violence In The Streets and The Death of George Floyd

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayWPqQIxfYsAn enlightening discussion between professors Ben Bayer, Greg Salmieri, and Onkar Ghate of the Ayn Rand Institute on the violence in the streets across America and the killing of George Floyd in Minnesota by a policeman.

Salsman: Fiscal-Monetary ‘Stimulus’ is Depressive

Writes Richard Salsman in The Hill: on why Fiscal-monetary 'stimulus' is depressive (26 May 2020):
What is the case for “stimulus”? Many economists believe public spending and money issuance create wealth or purchasing power. Not so. Our only means of obtaining real goods and services is from wealth creation — production. Under barter no one comes to market expecting to buy stuff without also offering stuff. A monetary economy does not alter this key principle.[...]To see why “stimulus” truly depresses, consult the basics. The creation of public money and public debt is not the creation of wealth; it is not food, clothing, shelter, energy or the like. Even privately generated money and debt, which reflect the needs of trade and lengthy production chains, represent, facilitate and circulate wealth but are not themselves wealth. Meanwhile, the savings borrowed by governments are unavailable to productive enterprises, and when a government creates fiat money beyond what money holders demand, the money loses purchasing power, which boosts the cost of living. These are not roads to prosperity.

Legal Challenges to the Lockdowns

From Pacific Legal Foundation:
Napa, California; May 27, 2020: Faced with an imminent legal challenge from a local retail art gallery, Napa County officials said late yesterday that retail art galleries may open for business as part of California’s Stage 2 reopening plan.Quent and Linda Cordair sought to reopen their gallery, Quent Cordair Fine Art, using social distancing, masks, and limiting the number of customers. But Napa County ordered them to remain closed and threatened the Cordairs and their landlord with fines if they reopened ahead of California’s reopening plan. The state’s reopening plan classifies retail businesses Stage 2, while art galleries are Stage 3.The Cordairs sent a letter to Napa County, urging them to treat the gallery like other retail business and to allow them to reopen with other Stage 2 retail stores, but the county never responded.After attorneys from Pacific Legal Foundation informed the county of an impending lawsuit from the Cordairs, county officials responded that retail art galleries would be considered Stage 2 retail businesses and that they may resume operations.“We are delighted that Quent and Linda Cordair may now open their business,” said Anastasia Boden, senior attorney at Pacific Legal Foundation. “It was deeply unfair that the state considered art galleries Stage 3 when the Cordairs’ shop is no different than the dozens of retail stores permitted to open now. While the government can regulate to protect public health, laws cannot be arbitrary.”As a result of the county’s announcement, the Cordairs are no longer moving forward with their planned lawsuit.“We are happy that we can sell our art to willing customers, with recommended safety protocols in place,” said Linda Cordair. “But we shouldn’t have to go through all this trouble to get permission. We should be able to pursue our passion, earn a living, and serve our customers without having to threaten legal action.”
Elan Journo interviews Anastasia Boden, Pacific Legal Foundation's senior attorney at Pacific Legal Foundation, and Steve Simpson a legal scholar with the Ayn Rand Institute: 

Pick The Man, Pin The Crime: The Saga of Michael Flynn

In an address given eighty years ago by the then-Attorney General of the United States, Robert H. Jackson made these prophetic words:
If the prosecutor is obliged to choose his cases, it follows that he can choose his defendants. Therein is the most dangerous power of the prosecutor: that he will pick people that he thinks he should get, rather than pick cases that need to be prosecuted. With the law books filled with a great assortment of crimes, a prosecutor stands a fair chance of finding at least a technical violation of some act on the part of almost anyone. In such a case, it is not a question of discovering the commission of a crime and then looking for the man who has committed it, it is a question of picking the man and then searching the law books, or putting investigators to work, to pin some offense on him. It is this realm in which the prosecutor picks some person whom he dislikes or desires to embarrass, or selects some group of unpopular persons and then looks for an offense, that the greatest danger of abuse of prosecuting power lies. It is here that law enforcement becomes personal, and the real crime becomes that of being unpopular with the predominant or governing group, being attached to the wrong political views, or being personally obnoxious to or in the way of the prosecutor himself." [Robert H. Jackson, "The Federal Prosecutor" April 1, 1940.]
Given documents released as a result of the independent review ordered by Attorney General William Barr, that this is what happened to Michael Flynn.According to Jonathan Turley, the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University, Flynn was railroaded in what liberal law professor, "galling and grotesque" and an "utter travesty of justice."According to Turley:
Previously undisclosed documents in the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn offer us a chilling blueprint on how top FBI officials not only sought to entrap the former White House aide but sought to do so on such blatantly unconstitutional and manufactured grounds.[...]
The new documents also explore how the Justice Department could get Flynn to admit breaking the Logan Act [(18 U.S.C. §953)], a law that dates back to from 1799 which makes it a crime for a citizen to intervene in disputes between the United States and foreign governments. It has never been used to convict a citizen and is widely viewed as flagrantly unconstitutional. [Jonathan Turley "Michael Flynn case should be dismissed to preserve justice", The Hill, 30 April 2020.]
Or, in Robert H. Jackson's prophetic words: "With the law books filled with a great assortment of crimes, a prosecutor stands a fair chance of finding at least a technical violation of some act on the part of almost anyone."Not only has the 1799 Logan Act, never been used to convict anyone, but it has been repeatedly violated:
In modern times, many prominent individuals—like Jesse Jackson, Danny Glover, Sean Penn, Dennis Rodman, Ted Kennedy, and John Kerry–have violated the act, some repeatedly. Even if the act could be applied to many private individuals, it makes no sense to apply it to an appointee of an incoming administration whose duties include speaking with representatives of foreign governments. In fact, the motion to dismiss admits that “the Logan Act would be difficult to prosecute.”  [John G. Malcolm Zack Smith Hans von Spakovsky, "Michael Flynn Seems to Finally Be Getting the Justice He Deserves", The National Interest, 8 May 2020]
Even worse, it appears McCabe, Strzok, Comey, and various "FBI officials also lied and acted in arguably criminal or unethical ways, but all escaped without charges" according to Turley:
McCabe had a supervisory role in the Flynn prosecution. He was then later found by the Justice Department inspector general to have repeatedly lied to investigators. While his case was referred for criminal charges, McCabe was fired but never charged. Strzok was also fired for his misconduct in the investigation. Comey intentionally leaked FBI material, including potentially classified information but was never charged. Another FBI agent responsible for the secret warrants used for the Russia investigation had falsified evidence to maintain the investigation. He is still not indicted. The disconnect of these cases with the treatment of Flynn is galling and grotesque.[...]Mueller had ignored the view of the investigators and coerced Flynn to plead to a crime he did not commit to gain damaging testimony against Trump and his associates that Flynn did not have.
Let us recall Jackson's words again "It is here that law enforcement becomes personal, and the real crime becomes that of being unpopular with the predominant or governing group, being attached to the wrong political views, or being personally obnoxious to or in the way of the prosecutor himself."I expect the twists and turns in the Flynn case will eventually make its way into a blockbuster movie -- I can see Rob Lowe easily playing Michael Flynn, but in the meantime for a breakdown of the Flynn saga, read "Michael Flynn Seems to Finally Be Getting the Justice He Deserves" and "Michael Flynn case should be dismissed to preserve justice." 

Voice of Capitalism

Capitalism news delivered every Monday to your email inbox.

Subscribed. Check your email box for confirmation.

Pin It on Pinterest