Oct 9, 2005 | Dollars & Crosses
From Cox and Forkum: 
From AFP: Islam permits killing of 'infidel' civilians: Zarqawi tape (via Jihad Watch).DUBAI -- Al Qaeda frontman in Iraq Abu Musab Al Zarqawi has said Islam permits the killing of "infidel" civilians, according to an audiotape broadcast on the Internet early Saturday.
"In Islam, making the difference is not based on civilians and military, but on the basis of Muslims and infidels," said the voice attributed to the fugitive leader who has a 25-million-dollar price on his head.
"The Muslim's blood cannot be spilled whatever his work or place, while spilling the blood of the infidel, whatever his work or place, is authorized if he is not trustworthy," said the tape, whose veracity could not be determined.
The recording comes a day after US officials claimed to have seized a letter allegedly sent to Zarqawi by Al Qaeda number two Ayman Zawahiri, in which he raised concerns over the impact on Arab opinion of videotaped executions.
Zarqawi, a Jordanian-born Islamist extremist, is Iraq's most wanted man.
His Al Qaeda Group of Jihad in the Land of Two Rivers has claimed responsibility for some of the most gruesome attacks in Iraq, including the beheadings of foreign hostages and Iraqis.
UPDATE I -- Oct. 10: Regarding President Bush's speech last week, I'm happy to note that he finally -- four years after 9/11 -- came out and explicitly named the enemy: "Some call this evil Islamic radicalism; others, militant Jihadism; still others, Islamo-fascism." For this, we applaud the President. Unfortunately, in the very next sentence he quickly added: "Whatever it's called, this ideology is very different from the religion of Islam." "Very different"? There may be many secularized, moderate Muslims today. But to say what motivates the terrorists is somehow foreign to Islam is ridiculous. Apparently Bush is still disarmed by the some sort of multicultural/religious sensitivity. Investor's Business Daily had an excellent editorial detailing the shortcomings of President Bush's speech: Defining The Enemy.Continuing to pretend that terrorism is a distortion of Islam's supposedly "peaceful" and "tolerant" nature — and not a predictable outcome of jihad, its 6th pillar — may soothe the savage beast of political correctness. But it's no way to win a war against real savages. That can only come from frank national discourse over what is motivating them, where they are getting that motivation, and how to implement effective methods to disrupt it.
UPDATE II: The first article above mentions a letter seized by the U.S. military, which indicated "concerns over the impact on Arab opinion of videotaped executions." There was even more to the letter than that. From CNN: Pentagon: Bin Laden deputy complains about money, Iraq tactics.An intercepted letter from Osama bin Laden's deputy to the al Qaeda leader in Iraq complains that the terrorist network is short of cash and faces defeat in Afghanistan, a Pentagon spokesman says. [Emphasis added]
UPDATE III -- Oct. 11: The seized letter has now been fully released and has made the main story on CNN's site: Al Qaeda letter called 'chilling'.The letter outlines a four-stage plan to expand the war in Iraq: Expel U.S. forces, establish an Islamic authority, take the fight to Iraq's secular neighbors and battle with Israel -- "because Israel was established only to challenge any new Islamic entity."
Oct 7, 2005 | Dollars & Crosses
ARI executive director Dr. Yaron Brook is scheduled to appear on the CNBC program "On the Money" tonight, October 7, 2005. The program airs between 7:00 and 8:00 pm Eastern. The topic will be: Should the UN Control the Internet?Oct 4, 2005 | Dollars & Crosses
From AP: EU Wants Shared Control of Internet.BRUSSELS, Belgium - The European Union insisted Friday that governments and the private sector must share the responsibility of overseeing the Internet, setting the stage for a showdown with the United States on the future of Internet governance. A senior U.S. official reiterated Thursday that the country wants to remain the Internet's ultimate authority, rejecting calls in a United Nations meeting in Geneva for a U.N. body to take over. EU spokesman Martin Selmayr said a new cooperation model was important "because the Internet is a global resource." A stalemate over who should serve as the principal traffic cops for Internet routing and addressing could derail the summit, which aims to ensure a fair sharing of the Internet for the benefit of the whole world. At issue is who would have ultimate authority over the Internet's master directories, which tell Web browsers and e-mail programs how to direct traffic. That role has historically gone to the United States, which created the Internet as a Pentagon project and funded much of its early development. The U.S. Commerce Department has delegated much of that responsibility to a U.S.-based private organization with international board members, but Commerce ultimately retains veto power. Some countries have been frustrated that the United States and European countries that got on the Internet first gobbled up most of the available addresses required for computers to connect, leaving developing nations with a limited supply to share.
From last week's Washington Times: U.S. tells nations hands of Internet (hat tip Allen Forkum)
From ARI:
IRVINE, CA-- A cabal of countries, including Cuba, Syria, China and Iran--now backed by the European Union--is demanding that control of the Internet be surrendered to the United Nations.
These and other thug-nations restrict their own citizens' ability to receive and broadcast news and grievances from inside their blood-soaked walls. China, for instance, currently has many individuals jailed for being "cyber-dissidents" and it engages in massive censorship of the Internet. It recently passed a law mandating that only "healthy and civilized" news may be read by its citizens--to be determined, of course, by the same "civilized" officials who brought us Tiananmen Square.
This world-wide web of evil nations, hiding behind the veneer of technical complaints, now seeks to control not just what its own citizens are able to see and say on the Internet, but what every individual on the face of the planet is able to see and say. If the UN is given control of the Internet, we can expect free trade and freedom of speech to be crushed.
The Internet was created in and by the land of the free, America. It has now become the object of an alarming power-grab by the world's dictatorships and their puppet, the UN. America must not surrender its citizens' freedom to the mercy of a debating society for dictators.
Oct 3, 2005 | Dollars & Crosses
Writes Wayne Dunn on the economics and morality of Price Gouging:
It's the criminalization of price hikes -- not the hikes themselves -- that's immoral. The moral premise behind price-gouging laws is summed up in the altruistic injunction, "People before profits" -- as if merchants aren't people. What this "ethical" position really boils down to, then, is that the needs and desires of some people (consumers) trump the needs and desires of other people (businessmen) and that in a pinch government should sacrifice the latter to the former.
[...] The high prices oblige consumers to economize. Artificially low prices, by contrast, invite hoarding and frivolous buying, emptying shelves sooner. For instance, someone able or willing to purchase only 10 jugs of water at a "gouged" price might've bought 30 if the price were "normal," leaving less for others customers.
Oct 2, 2005 | Dollars & Crosses
Writes Professor Brian Thompson in Who's Really to Blame for High Gasoline Prices?:
One thing is certain: oil companies are not to blame for high gas prices. These companies are responsible for producing the gasoline we need. In California, where gas prices are among the highest in the nation, the oil industry has been repeatedly investigated to find evidence of "price manipulation" (four times in 2003 alone) and none has ever been found.
Although there are other causes of high gas prices, such as high gasoline taxes, the primary cause is environmental regulation. For example, environmental regulation significantly restricts drilling for oil in Alaska and on the continental shelf. More drilling could considerably increase the gasoline supply (up to 20% from greater Alaskan drilling alone) and thus lower prices.
Oct 1, 2005 | Dollars & Crosses
This series of articles and declassified U.S. government documents recounts the death of the destroyer of the Cuban economy: Ernesto "Che" Guevara who died looking like a "piece of trash." Interesting quotes on the real effect of Che's policies:
A CIA Intelligence Memorandum discusses what analysts perceive as Che Guevara's fall from power within the Cuban government beginning in 1964. It states that at the end of 1963, Guevara's plan of "rapid industrialization and centralization during the first years of the Revolution brought the economy to its lowest point since Castro came to power." "Guevara's outlook, which approximated present -day Chinese--rather than Soviet--economic practice, was behind the controversy." In July 1964, "two important cabinet appointments signaled the power struggle over internal economic policy which culminated in Guevara's elimination." Another conflict was that Guevara wanted to export the Cuban Revolution to different parts of Latin America and Africa, while "other Cuban leaders began to devote most of their attention to the internal problems of the Revolution." In December, 1964, Guevara departed on a three-month trip to the United States, Africa, and China. When he returned, according to the CIA report, his economic and foreign policies were in disfavor and he left to start revolutionary struggles in other parts of the world. (CIA Intelligence Memorandum, "The Fall of Che Guevara and the Changing Face of the Cuban Revolution," 10/18/65)
On Che's capture:
Che's final battle commences in Quebrada del Yuro. Simon Cuba (Willy) Sarabia, a Bolivian miner, leads the rebel group. Che is behind him and is shot in the leg several times. Sarabia picks up Che and tries to carry him away from the line of fire. The firing starts again and Che's beret is knocked off. Sarabia sits Che on the ground so he can return the fire. Encircled at less than ten yards distance, the Rangers concentrate their fire on him, riddling him with bullets. Che attempts to keep firing, but cannot keep his gun up with only one arm. He is hit again on his right leg, his gun is knocked out of his hand and his right forearm is pierced. As soldiers approach Che he shouts, "Do not shoot! I am Che Guevara and worth more to you alive than dead." The battle ends at approximately 3:30 p.m. Che is taken prisoner.
[...] Félix Rodríguez arrives by helicopter in La Higuera, along with Colonel Joaquín Zenteno Anaya. Rodríguez brings a powerful portable field radio and a camera with a special four-footed stand used to photograph documents. He quietly observes the scene in the schoolhouse, and records what he sees, finding the situation "gruesome" with Che lying in dirt, his arms tied behind his back and his feet bound together, next to the bodies of his friends. He looks "like a piece of trash" with matted hair, torn clothes, and wearing only pieces of leather on his feet for shoes. In one interview, Rodríguez states that, " I had mixed emotions when I first arrived there. Here was the man who had assassinated many of my countrymen. And nevertheless, when I saw him, the way he looked....I felt really sorry for him." (Rodríguez:2)
Also worth reading: The Cult of CheSep 30, 2005 | Dollars & Crosses
For decades creationists have sought to replace evolution with the Book of Genesis. But defenders of evolution have consistently prevailed in the schools and the courts of law. This struggle for intellectual survival has led to the evolution of a new "species" of creationist, better adapted to its inhospitable environment. The new creationism goes by the name of "intelligent design" and poses a greater danger than old-style creationism. In this talk Dr. Lockitch will examine the intelligent design movement focusing on its similarities and differences with standard creationism. By hiding its religious essence behind a cloak of pseudo-science, the movement seeks to make itself more palatable to intellectuals and the general public. And because today's academics--including the most passionate and vocal defenders of evolution--are incapable of answering its most fundamental arguments, the doors of our colleges and schools are ominously open to primitive mysticism masquerading as science.
One hour lecture followed by one hour Q and A. (Details: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 7:30 to 9:30 PM at SGM-123 (Seely G. Mudd), 3620 McClintock, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089)Sep 29, 2005 | Dollars & Crosses
A new quarterly journal -- The Objective Standard -- has been launched, with the following announcement:
The Objective Standard is a quarterly journal of culture and politics written from the perspective that man's life on earth is the proper standard of morality. According to this principle, that which supports or promotes an individual's life is good, that which retards or destroys it is evil. The purpose of the journal is to analyze and evaluate ideas, trends, events, and policies with respect to this standard.
The Objective Standard provides a rational, principled alternative to the ideas of both liberalism and conservatism. Whereas liberals hold that morality is subjective (i.e., feeling-based), that majority opinion is the standard of value, that sacrifice for the common good is noble, and that rights are social conventions; and whereas conservatives hold that morality is grounded in religion (i.e., faith-based), that God's will is the standard of value, that sacrifice in obedience to His commands is good, and that rights are divine decrees; we hold that morality is grounded in the objective requirements of human life (i.e., reason-based), that man's life is the standard of value, that the selfish pursuit of one's life-serving goals is good, and that individual rights are moral principles defining the basic requirements of a civilized society. Ours is a philosophy of reason, egoism, and laissez-faire capitalism. In a word, we advocate Objectivism, the philosophy of Ayn Rand, and we apply this philosophy to the cultural and political issues of the day.
Contributing writers include Craig Biddle, Yaron Brook, Alex Epstein, Elan Journo, John Lewis, Keith Lockitch, Larry Salzman, and Lisa VanDamme.
Sep 28, 2005 | Dollars & Crosses
Imagine and visualize yourself as your psychological ideal. Then strive to live up to that ideal each day, but don't expect to be there all at once. Build that ideal one brick at a time, with the confidence that as you get better and better and the motivation goes up, you'll speed up and pile on many bricks at one time.Sep 27, 2005 | Dollars & Crosses
I saw a bumper sticker the other day. It read something like, "The Proud Parent of an Autistic Child." The word AUTISTIC was in all caps.
I have to be honest here. Is it any more rational to be proud of the fact that your child is autistic than it is to be ashamed? As I understand it, autism is an inherited condition. It's nobody's fault, and nobody created the condition on purpose. So why be proud of it? Pride, like shame, applies to something that you chose, or allowed to happen, or are in some way responsible for.
The deeper problem here is political correctness. We've gone from a society dominated by individuals who hide in shame from things they shouldn't be ashamed of, to a society consisting of people who exclaim with pride their various conditions and neuroses. I don't like this sort of cultural attitude any more than the one that preceded it.Sep 26, 2005 | Dollars & Crosses
From Reporters Without Borders:
Reporters Without Borders voiced deep shock today at the public beating which pro-government paramilitaries gave Guillermo Fariñas, the editor of the independent Cubanacán Press agency, in the central city of Santa Clara on 16 September after he took part in a protest against the arrest of a dissident. "This extremely violent attack on Fariñas shows that Cuban independent journalists are not just under threat from the government but also from ultra-revolutionaries, who in this case vented their anger on Fariñas as the political police looked on," the press freedom organisation said. The attack came after Fariñas and some 15 other government opponents demonstrated outside a police station to demand the release of Noelia Pedraza Jiménez, a fellow dissident who had just been arrested. About 100 paramilitaries watched the demonstration.After announcing to the demonstrators that Pedraza would shortly be released pending trial, Vladimir Méndez Mauad, a captain with the state security department, offered to drive Fariña home as he currently has to use crutches because of a disability and, until recently, had to use a wheelchair. However, as Fariñas left the police station, a police officer warned him that whatever happened to him outside at the hands of the paramilitaries "will be your problem."
According to Fariñas, the approximately 60 paramilitaries armed with clubs who were still outside then challenged him, asking him if he had the courage to repeat to them what he had said on Radio Martí (the Miami-based Cuban exile radio station). Kneeling and with his hands behind his head, Fariñas replied : "Why do you listen to Radio Martí if you are revolutionaries ?" After Fariñas refused to say, "Long live Fidel Castro," they began to insult him and hit him with their clubs until one of them call a halt, fearing that they would kill him in public. Political instructors with the ruling Communist Party of Cuba then drove him to a deserted spot 23 km outside the city and dumped him there. Fariñas told Reporters Without Borders his arms and hands are so swollen from the beating that he can no longer write or use a computer keyboard. He added that he thought he was now top of the list of people to be arrested in "the next crackdown."
Sep 23, 2005 | Dollars & Crosses
You can view an online video or a transcript of Andrew Bernstein (author of the Capitalist Mainfesto) on the Abrams Report on the moral and practical reasons against price controls on gasoline during an emergency (Hat Tip: Jim Woods).
"One is the moral point and that is if somebody owns property that I don't own, they have a right to ask any price for what they want just as I have the right to refuse that price. Also, the practical point is that on a free market when the price rises, what that does is enables the producer to make more profit giving them more motivation... to increase the supply."--Andrew Bernstein
Also worth reading: "Price Gouging" in Florida by Thomas Sowell which talks about why prices should rise during hurricanes if the market demands it.Sep 22, 2005 | Dollars & Crosses
From a Space.com news item on NASA's Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) spacecraft:
NASA's Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) spacecraft has spotted new gullies and a fresh crater – in astronomical terms – etched into the red planet's surface, mission scientists said Tuesday. Now in its eighth year in orbit around Mars, the MGS spacecraft found the new gullies cutting through a sand dune, as well as numerous other signs that the planet is far from a static, unchanging world. "[The gullies] are probably not the result of water action on the sand dune," said Michael Malin, principal investigator for the Mars Orbiter Camera aboard MGS, during teleconference with reporters. "What we think is going on here is that carbon dioxide snow has been incorporated into the sand dune." As the snow melts and evaporates into gas, it allows the sand around it to fluidize and run down the dune slope, Malin added.
[..] The spacecraft also observed a gradual evaporation of carbon dioxide ice in one of Mars' polar caps, pointing to a slowly changing Mars climate. "They way these polar pits are retreating is absolutely astounding," Mustard said. But like the rockfalls, researchers were unable to account for the gradual climate change. "Why is Mars warmer today that it was in the past, we really have no way of knowing why," Malin said. ["Mars Probe Finds New Gullies, Crater at Red Planet"]
Could this be global warming caused by the Martians use of man-made fossil fuels?
Comments blogger Ewan Coley at Brain Terminal:
Let's see:- Earth getting warmer.
- Mars getting warmer.
- Increased solar activity.
Gotta be those fossil fuels.
Sep 21, 2005 | Dollars & Crosses
Another brilliant piece by Elan Journo of the Ayn Rand Institute:
Consider, for instance, the beleaguered UN Human Rights Commission, ostensibly responsible for protecting rights across the world. On the principle of neutrality, a country's brutal practices are no disqualification from joining this commission. Indeed, it has become infested with tyrannies; Syria and Cuba, two blood-soaked dictatorships, have each served as its chairman. And through the commission, notorious violators of individual rights scheme to bury any criticism of themselves. A bloc of Islamic countries, for example, self-righteously defends barbaric practices--stoning to death, crucifixion--carried out in certain states governed by Sharia. When a proposal was drafted to censure North Korea, which arbitrarily executes its enslaved citizens, the motion was soundly defeated thanks to Cuba, Algeria, Libya, Sudan, Zimbabwe, and others all guilty of similar and worse atrocities. (The toothless proposal to replace the commission with a new council on rights was foreseeable. Since tyrannies have voting prerogatives on UN "reforms," they will sink any proposed council or mold it into a new shield to deflect censure of them.)
Or consider the money corrupt regimes gain access to. For years the UN has showered millions of dollars in aid on the Palestinian Authority, the interim government in Gaza and the West Bank. That aid, mostly swallowed up by the leadership, has buoyed up a brutal regime that strips its people of their rights, their wealth, their dignity, and foments terrorism against Israel. UN aid has also flowed into North Korea's belligerent Stalinist dictatorship, which starves its people in order to fund an enormous military machine and a nuclear-weapons program. What these handouts do is reinforce the walls of prison regimes like North Korea, exacerbate the misery of their citizens, and arm corrupt rulers. [Elan Journo, The UN's "Virtue" Is Its Vice]
For more on the UN see: www.UNisEvil.comSep 19, 2005 | Dollars & Crosses
IRVINE, CA--Four years have passed since the Sept. 11 massacre by Islamic terrorists, and the threat of yet another attack still looms. That's because a real war has yet to be waged.
The terrorists fighting for Islamic totalitarianism were and are made possible by the dictatorial regimes--including Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia--that support them. Victory requires defeating these regimes. At the very least, we must eliminate the biggest sponsor of Islamic totalitarianism, Iran, which is rapidly trying to build a nuclear bomb while its mullahs chant "Death to America!"
But the Bush administration has substituted the legitimate goal of ending hostile regimes in self-defense with the illegitimate goal of bringing "democracy" to Afghanistan and Iraq. This has allowed Iran and others to orchestrate an insurgency in Iraq that has emboldened the Islamic totalitarians and their supporters and demoralized the United States. Longer term, there's a significant chance that Iraq (or major parts of it) will vote itself into an Islamo-fascist state like Iran.
History demonstrates that the way to defeat an enemy is to destroy its capacity and will to fight by bringing the war into its heartland. That's how Japan and Germany were rendered non-threatening.
The United States must focus its energy on ending the bomb-building, terrorist-sponsoring dictatorship of Iran. Let the real war on terrorism begin, before it's too late. [Source: ARI]Sep 19, 2005 | Dollars & Crosses
From the New York Post: Anon, Annan.
The 840-page Oil-for-Food report released last week by the Volcker Independent Inquiry Commission is a damning document: It demonstrates as clearly as possible that not only is the United Nations broken, but that present management -- specifically, Kofi Annan -- is ill-equipped to fix it.
Related:
The Volcker Oil-for-Food Interim Reports: No Exoneration for U.N. Corruption (April 20, 2005)
Contrary to Annan's claims, the reports do not in any way vindicate him or the United Nations.
United Nations Scandal: Kofi Annan Aide Shredded Thousands of Documents (April 9, 2005)
The destruction of highly sensitive documents by Kofi Annan's chief aide is a massive obstruction of justice that demands major congressional investigation. It gives the impression of a huge cover-up at the very heart of the United Nations, and casts a dark cloud over the credibility of the UN secretary-general. It projects an image of impunity, arrogance and unaccountability on the part of the leadership of the United Nations.
Sep 15, 2005 | Dollars & Crosses
From Cox and Forkum:
From AP: Iran Proclaims Right to Nuclear Energy.In a fiery speech to the U.N. General Assembly, [Iranian] President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad denied his nation had any intention of producing nuclear weapons. To prove that, he offered foreign countries and companies a role in Iran's nuclear energy production.
The Iranian leader lashed out at the United States for its insistence on keeping its nuclear weapons even as it rejected Iran's efforts to build a peaceful energy program.
He said Iran has a right to produce nuclear fuel under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and implicitly accused the Europeans and Americans of "misrepresenting" Iran's desire for civilian nuclear energy "as the pursuit of nuclear weapons."
"This is nothing more than a pure propaganda ploy," he said.
"The Islamic Republic of Iran reiterates its previously and repeatedly declared position that in accordance with our religious principles, pursuit of nuclear weapons is prohibited," Ahmadinejad said.
Sep 11, 2005 | Dollars & Crosses
Required reading on September 11th:
End States Who Sponsor Terrorism by Leonard Peikoff
Fifty years of increasing American appeasement in the Mideast have led to fifty years of increasing contempt in the Muslim world for the U.S. The climax was September 11, 2001.
Nihilism and the War Against Western Civilization by J. David Lewis
The attack of September 11, 2001 was only one incident in a concerted war on western civilization.Hatred of Western Civilization: Why Terrorists Attacked America by J. David Lewis
The hatred of the West is not based on jealousy but on hatred of the good because it is good. Nihilism, the desire to destroy, is why the enemies of freedom fly planes into buildings and blow themselves up with dynamite.
Diverting the Blame for September 11th by Onkar Ghate
Sept. 11 could have been prevented only by having a principled foreign policy.
What Have We Lost? by Robert W. Tracinski
One year later, the hole in New York's skyline where the World Trade Center towers once stood is a visual reminder of something else that is missing: the ideas and attitudes that make a vigorous war in America's self-defense possible.
The Betrayal of The Bush Doctrine by Alex Epstein
One year after his speech to Congress, President Bush has failed to fight a real war on terrorism.
Forgotten Heroes of 9/11 by Onkar Ghate
On the anniversary of the Sept. 11 attack on our way of life,justice demands that we acknowledge an overlooked hero: the businessman.
Columbus Day: The Cure for 9/11 by Thomas A. Bowden
Columbus Day's celebration of Western Civilization reminds Americans why they deserve to win the war against Islamic totalitarianism.
Reflecting America: World Trade Center Memorial Should Celebrate America's Producers by Diane Durante
The people who worked at the World Trade Center (WTC) were all productive people: they were there to do a job and earn money. They died on September 11 because they symbolized that productivity, not just to millions around the world who aspire to live like Americans, but also to the terrorists who despise all that America stands for.
Is Islam at Fault? by Warren Ross
There is a lot of confusion about the nature of Islam, and the extent to which it is the religion itself, as opposed to an "extremist" wing of it, that breeds terrorism. President Bush believes that Islam has been "hijacked" by the terrorists for their own use, and that Islam itself is a peace-loving religion. Is that true? Or is there something about Islam that promotes, condones or ideologically endorses terrorism? Is it a fundamental aspect of Islam, or a perverted interpretation?
A New Yorker Remembers the World Trade Center by Andrew West
"[P]eople tell me about pilgrimages to some dank pest-hole in a jungle where they go to do homage to a crumbling temple, to a leering stone monster with a pot belly, created by some leprous savage. Is it beauty and genius they want to see? Do they seek a sense of the sublime? Let them come to New York."