The New York Sun's liberal columnist Errol Louis makes a good point about "three-strikes" laws:

In 1997, [Santos] Reyes was caught at a Department of Motor Vehicles office in San Bernardino, using a cheat sheet to complete the written portion of a driver's test.

At trial, where his limited English skills required the use of translator, Reyes freely admitted he was trying to help get a license for one of his cousins, who knows how to drive but is illiterate. What Reyes didn't know--and what his court-appointed attorney apparently failed to explain--is that lying on a DMV application constitutes perjury.

Reyes was convicted of perjury, and the court found two prior strikes: a robbery committed 10 years earlier, and a burglary committed in 1981, when Reyes was a juvenile. He was duly sentenced to 26-to-life....

[A] heroin addict named Leandro Andrade [was sentenced] to prison for 50 years. The final two of that wretched thief's three strikes occurred when he stole a few videotapes from a K-Mart, then returned two weeks later to shoplift another five tapes from the same store (estimated value: $84.70)....

[A] concerted political drive to make American law more conservative resulted in a one-vote majority in support of the view, advanced by Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas, that "cruel and unusual" means only what the 18th-century framers of the Constitution would consider cruel and unusual

Voice of Capitalism

Capitalism news delivered every Monday to your email inbox.

Subscribed. Check your email box for confirmation.

Pin It on Pinterest